3 Responses to “Lord Monckton Interview / Carbon tax and ‘effect’ on global temperature”

1. 1 Philip Bruce Heywood Apr 1st, 2011 at 12:23 am

   Men of God have shown an interest in scientific and other matters and have employed questions of science for the purposes of the Kingdom. The following is a quote from the Reader’s Digest’s GREAT LIVES, GREAT DEEDS, 1966, an article by W.F. McDermott, titled, “He Brought Hope to Millions”. ‘He’ being John Wesley.
   “Once, in Staffordshire, J.W. was stoned by a mob and slugged with a club. Beaten to the ground, he prayed with such earnestness and calm that the mob grew quiet. Suddenly the leader put his hand on Wesley’s head and said dramatically, ‘Sir, I will spend my life for you. Not one soul shall harm a hair of your head.’ The man was George Clifton, prize-fighter and gang leader. Completely reformed, Clifton became an ardent preacher………………………………….. . Though slavery was protected by law and considered highly respectable, Wesley did not hesitate to fight it. ……….. . In 1761 he was able to commend the transformation of Newgate Prison from ‘filth, stench and wickedness’ ………. The key to that improvement lay in the fact that the keeper of the prison was a convert …………….. . His writings were prodigious … four volume history of England …….. his best seller was a primitive medical booklet …… . Years before Darwin he concluded that ‘there is a prodigious number of continued links between the most perfect man and the ape.’

   The previous post (below) investigates Sunni v Shia division in Islam. That final phrase in the above quote might seem designed to trigger a similar schism in ‘fundamental’ Christianity. ‘Continued links between ..man..and.. ape”.

   Christianity is a religion of grace. ‘By grace ye are saved, through faith’. Luther rediscovered that at the Reformation and the spread of grace and forgiveness brought peace and unity in its train. Nevertheless, even Luther had difficulties co-operating with other men of God over points of doctrine.

   We need more grace. Only grace and forgiveness stop the church from going down the pathway of internal schism finally leading to open war.

   So, what? What’s new?

   This carbon imbroglio is new. The technical facts that disprove the need for it are new. (Those new facts nevertheless go hand- in – hand with the Bible and with the christian worldview of the sovereignity of God and the inability of Man to control the weather by human power.)

   Geologists are somewhat responsible for digging the stuff out of the ground in the first place and it’s the geologic evidence that technically lays to rest the carbon–global warming scare.
   And that technical evidence is pointed to by certain of the biblical types (especially, involving the sun. earth, and moon).

   But geologic science, is held to be anti-scriptural, by certain parts of the Body of Christ.

   In short: here we have an opportunity if not a crying need to speak with authority and reassurance to Australia; the authority is nothing less than the holy Scriptures and the Scriptures are one with the very latest developments in science. Those developments in science being highly suspect to a significant proportion of those wishing to speak with authority!

   It took the world a century to come to equilibrium with a sun – centred solar system. Luther opposed it on the basis that it contradicted a literal reading of Scripture. Kepler, who was (shock, horror) a lutheran or something suspiciously like one, calculated the planet’s motions and rejoiced in putting the sun — a type of Christ — at the centre of everything.
   They are still trying to decide whether Sir Isaac Newton was a christian or merely a deist or something similar, but he definitely was a strict 24-hour day creationist — like Luther, and unlike many of the church fathers. They are still trying to figure out whether Einstein was a creationist, an atheist, or simply a total enigma; but he was a son of Abraham by physical descent, and a man who did more to prove the biblical types than any scientist before him. The light of the world, the universal constant, that ‘changes not” — although the 24hr day people wish it would change, to satisfy the 24hr day of creation!

   Wherever Wesley comes in here, who knows? We can safely assume, perhaps, that that man of God did believe that Man is made in the image of God — whether he resembles the ape, or no.

   Here’s a quizz. If the sun is a type of God the Father; and if the Earth is a type of Man (Adam; ‘that red earth”): and if we visualize, say, a father and son walking along, hand-in-hand: do you think our climate is something the Earth controls; or is it something that the sun controls – but not without constant information feedback from the Earth?

   It happens partly through magnetic field interaction. Our climate actually modifies our magnetic field. Our field feeds back relevant information as it interacts with the sun’s field. The first clear lead pointing to the possibility that it happens (as far as I know) was published 2009. It’s embryonic information, but it’s definite. Only someone with a Bible and/or an understanding of the geologic record would be likely to see the significance. Since a majority of scientists now claim to be atheist, and quite a few Bible literalists claim the geologic record is suspect—— !

   Thirty years ago, I tried to teach Origins. Since there was confusion in that field, I was obliged to ask the Almighty to make the topic intelligible, so that I could explain it to students. He made it intelligible, and I have been thirty years trying to give it away to a christian body to publish so that when people out there see that the Bible is undeniably, technically correct, they have someone to introduce them personally to its Author.

   Someone is entitled to go up to the Parliament and to the people, and say, “Thus saith the Lord”. “And thus saith science”. “The two are one”. We might look like apes (nothing personal there!) but it’s not for the reasons Darwin suggested. If it’s for any reason, it’s the technical reason elucidated in holy Writ, and confirmed by the latest technology. That technology became known a decade or two past: the global temperatrure control technology is only just now being glimpsed.

2. 2 Jean Patrick Apr 4th, 2011 at 10:23 am

   THEY CALL IT GLOBAL WARMING i CALL IT GLOBAL WARNING !!
   Jean Patrick

3. 3 Alan Tattersall May 12th, 2011 at 10:25 am

   It is interesting to note that carbon has 6 electrons, 6 protons and 6 neutrons making it the 666 atom!

   This makes the Carbon Tax the 666 Tax

   (NKJV) 1 Kings 10:14 The weight of gold that came to Solomon yearly was six hundred and sixty-six talents of gold, :15 besides [that] from the traveling merchants, from the income of traders, from all the kings of Arabia, and from the governors of the country.

   Here 666 talents of gold appears to be a tax to the common people – another 666 tax!

   Carbon in the air is a natural part of plant growth. Plants capture the carbon from the air and release the oxygen we breath
   Carbon is what plants are built on and when they burn it is released back into the atmosphere to repeat the process that they propose to tax us on.

   What an obvious con this is!

Leave a Reply

Name

Mail (will not be published)

Website

---

---